I would be safe in saying that many readers are sick of reading selectively researched and totally biased dribble from the Devine Miranda. You see, Dr. Wodak is an expert in his field and relies on medical facts, science and human compassion. This is a stark dichotomy compared to Miranda Devine. Appealing to the ignorant masses or stroking the ideological G-spot of anti-drug zealots may be Devines forte but it just uncovers her real agenda ... her belief that drug use is a moral issue and drug users need to be punished. Ironically, it’s Devine who regularly accuses Dr. Wodak and other medical professionals as having an agenda under the guise of that evil scourge called Harm Minimisation. The very policy that has saved millions of lives, given hope to desperate addicts and aims to treat people humanely. According to Devine, these “elitists” who support Harm Minimisation have a secret agenda to legalise drugs and they must be stopped. But what Devine and other prohibitionists conveniently overlook is that drug reformers simply want a system that works better than the current "War on Drugs" strategy. And their reasoning is simple ... drug use and addiction is a medical/social issue, not a law & order problem stemming from a moral decision to use drugs. It’s the likes of Miranda Devine who simplify an extremely complex issue to what they consider is right or wrong, good or bad, righteous or sinful, holy or evil. No wonder one side consists of doctors, specialists, medical experts, scientists, researchers, welfare workers, academics, realists, human rights supporters etc. and the other side is made up of moral crusaders, the religious right, modern conservatives, evangelists, born again Christians, politicians, the ignorant, neocons etc. Who would you trust?
Tide Turns In Favour Of Drug Reform
By Alex Wodak
Sydney Morning Herald
August 2009
One hundred years ago, the US convened the International Opium Conference. This meeting of 13 nations in Shanghai was the beginning of global drug prohibition.
Prohibition slowly became one of the most universally applied policies in the world. But a century on, international support for this blanket drug policy is slowly but inexorably unravelling.
In January, Barack Obama became the third US president in a row to admit to consumption of cannabis. Bill Clinton had admitted using cannabis but denied ever inhaling it. George Bush was taped saying in private he would never admit in public to having used cannabis. When Obama was asked whether he had inhaled cannabis, he said: ''Of course. That was the whole point.''
Obama has candidly discussed his drug use. ''Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow [cocaine] when you could afford it.'' He has also admitted the ''war on drugs is an utter failure'' and called for more focus on a public health approach.
In February, a Latin American drug policy commission similarly concluded that the ''drug war is a failure''. It recommended breaking the ''taboo on open debate including about cannabis decriminalisation''. The same month, an American diplomat said the US supported needle-exchange programs to help reduce the transmission of HIV and other blood-borne diseases, and supported using medication to treat those addicted to opiates.
In March, the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs met in Vienna as the culmination of a 10-year review of global drug policy. A ''political declaration'' was issued which, at the urging of the US, excluded the phrase ''harm reduction''. This omission caused a split in the fragile international consensus on drug policy and resulted in 26 countries, including Australia, demanding explicit support for harm reduction in a footnote.
In April, Michel Kazatchkine, of the Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria, argued in favour of decriminalising illicit drugs to allow efforts to halt the spread of HIV to succeed. The same month, a national Zogby poll in the US provided evidence of changing opinion on the legalisation of cannabis: 52 per cent supported cannabis becoming legal, taxed and regulated.
In May there was movement on several fronts. The Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, said: ''I think it's not time for [legalisation], but I think it's time for a debate.'' He was supported by a number of other American politicians, while Vicente Fox, a former Mexican president, said he was not yet convinced it was the solution but asked: ''Why not discuss it?'' The Colombian Vice-President, Francisco Santos Calderon, is already convinced. ''The only way you can really solve the problem [is] if you legalise it totally.''
Obama's drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske, the director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, said he wanted to banish the idea of fighting a ''war on drugs'', while the United Nations Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, said criminal sanctions on same-sex sex, commercial sex and drug injections were barriers for HIV treatment services. ''Those behaviours should be decriminalised, and people addicted to drugs should receive health services for the treatment of their addiction,'' he said.
In Germany, the federal parliament voted 63 per cent in favour to allow heroin prescription treatment.
In July, the Economic and Social Council, a UN body more senior than the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, approved a resolution requiring national governments to provide ''services for injecting drug users in all settings, including prisons'' and harm reduction programs such as needle syringe programs and substitution treatment for heroin users. This month, Mexico removed criminal sanctions for possessing any illicit drug in small quantities while Argentina is making similar changes for cannabis.
Portugal, Spain and Italy had earlier dropped criminal sanctions for possessing small amounts of any illicit drug, while the Netherlands and Germany have achieved the same effect by changing policing policy.
It is now clear that support for a drug policy heavily reliant on law enforcement is dwindling in Western Europe, the US and South America, while support for harm reduction and drug law reform is growing. Sooner or later this debate will start again in Australia.
Alex Wodak is director of the Alcohol and Drug Service at St Vincent's Hospital.
Related Articles:
The Ballad Of Alex And Miranda
Miranda Devine Vs. Reality
A Devine Nutter & That Booklet
Miranda Devine - Bitch Slapped by the Doctor
Are Flat Earth Journalist Intelligent? No ... Just Dangerous
No comments:
Post a Comment